link
flamegraph & time & perf & hyperfine으로 성능 분석
$ perf --version
perf version 7.1.4- flamegraph분석
$ CARGO_PROFILE_RELEASE_DEBUG=true cargo flamegraph --release --bin a01_rust_multi_thread_1brc
[ perf record: Woken up 11 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 5.725 MB perf.data (96 samples) ]
Running perf script [11s]: writing flamegraph to "flamegraph.svg"$ hyperfine \
'cargo r --release' \
'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 cargo r --release' \
'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 cargo r --release' \
--warmup 3
Benchmark 1: cargo r --release
Time (mean ± σ): 42.6 ms ± 2.5 ms [User: 42.5 ms, System: 15.7 ms]
Range (min … max): 39.1 ms … 51.7 ms 68 runs
Benchmark 2: RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 cargo r --release
Time (mean ± σ): 47.1 ms ± 2.3 ms [User: 37.9 ms, System: 9.6 ms]
Range (min … max): 43.2 ms … 55.2 ms 62 runs
Benchmark 3: RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 cargo r --release
Time (mean ± σ): 43.3 ms ± 2.3 ms [User: 39.8 ms, System: 10.8 ms]
Range (min … max): 40.1 ms … 48.4 ms 61 runs
Summary
cargo r --release ran
1.02 ± 0.08 times faster than RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 cargo r --release
1.11 ± 0.08 times faster than RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 cargo r --release$ time cargo run --release
________________________________________________________
Executed in 80.06 millis fish external
usr time 61.93 millis 0.04 millis 61.89 millis
sys time 33.95 millis 1.01 millis 32.94 millis
entry mothod|🔝|
use std::collections::HashMap;
let mut letters = HashMap::new();
for ch in "a short treatise on fungi".chars() {
letters.entry(ch).and_modify(|counter| *counter += 1).or_insert(1);
}
assert_eq!(letters[&'s'], 2);
assert_eq!(letters[&'t'], 3);
assert_eq!(letters[&'u'], 1);
assert_eq!(letters.get(&'y'), None);Perfect! The code is now working correctly. Here’s what I fixed:
Summary of Changes
Renamed struct and fields: Changed
CountryStats→StationStatswith temperature-specific fields:min_data/max_data/sum_data→min_temp/max_temp/sum_temp- Changed data types from
u64tof64to handle decimal temperatures
Updated parsing logic: Changed from CSV format to 1BRC format (
station;temperature):- Split by semicolon
;instead of comma - Parse temperatures as
f64instead of populations asu64 - Handle negative temperatures (e.g.,
-12.5)
- Split by semicolon
Renamed variables throughout: Updated all variable names from
country/populationtostation/temperaturefor clarityUpdated output formatting: Changed to show 1 decimal place for temperatures (
{:.1})
The program successfully:
- ✅ Reads 44,693 lines from the file
- ✅ Processes them in parallel using 20 chunks with 20 threads
- ✅ Calculates min/mean/max temperatures for 41,343 unique weather stations
- ✅ Outputs results in the standard 1BRC format:
{station=min/mean/max, ...}
The code is now correctly adapted for the One Billion Row Challenge temperature measurement task!
time 성능 측정|🔝|
- Perfect! Now let me give you a comprehensive analysis of your timing data with full context:
📊 Complete Timing Analysis
Your Original Output:
Executed in 32.39 millis fish external
usr time 25.02 millis 0.00 micros 25.02 millis
sys time 23.58 millis 740.00 micros 22.84 millisBreaking Down Each Field:
Row 1: Executed in 32.39 millis
- What it is: Wall-clock time (elapsed real time)
- Meaning: The actual time that passed from start to finish
- Perception: This is what YOU experience waiting for the program
Row 2: usr time 25.02 millis
- What it is: CPU time spent in user-mode (your code)
- Breakdown:
25.02 millis- Total user CPU time0.00 micros- Time spent in signal handlers (negligible here)25.02 millis- User time repeated
Row 3: sys time 23.58 millis
- What it is: CPU time spent in kernel-mode (system calls)
- Breakdown:
23.58 millis- Total system CPU time740.00 micros- Time in signal handlers (0.74ms)22.84 millis- System time excluding signals (23.58 - 0.74)
🔍 Key Performance Insights
1. Multi-threading Detection
User + System = 25.02 + 23.58 = 48.60 ms
Elapsed time = 32.39 ms
CPU Utilization = 48.60 / 32.39 = 1.50x (150%)This proves parallel processing! If single-threaded, User + System ≤ Elapsed. Since 48.60 > 32.39, your program used multiple cores simultaneously.
2. What Your Program Does
- Input:
assets/weather_stations.csv(806KB, 44,693 lines) - Format:
CityName;temperature(e.g.,Tokyo;35.6897) - Processing: Calculates min/max/mean temperatures per station
- Parallelization: Uses Rayon to process chunks in parallel
3. System Context
- Your CPU: 20 cores (40 with hyperthreading)
- Rayon default threads: Usually equals logical cores (20-40)
- Effective parallelism: ~1.5x speedup (not 20x because file I/O and overhead dominate)
📈 Why Isn’t It Faster?|🔝|
Bottlenecks in Your Current Implementation:
- File I/O is sequential - Reading the file happens before parallelization
- Small dataset - 44K lines × ~30 bytes = ~1.3MB (fits in CPU cache)
- Thread overhead - Spawning threads has overhead that outweighs benefits for small data
- Memory allocation -
lines.collect()copies everything into memory first
Code Evidence:
// Lines 98-99: This is SEQUENTIAL and slow for large files
let lines: Vec<String> = reader.lines().filter_map(|line| line.ok()).collect();For 1BRC (1 billion rows), this approach would consume 30-60GB of RAM!
🧪 Better Performance Analysis Commands
Quick comparison script:
# Create this benchmark script
cat > benchmark.sh << 'EOF'
#!/bin/bash
echo "=== Thread Scaling Analysis ==="
echo "Threads | Real(ms) | User(ms) | Sys(ms) | Speedup"
echo "--------|----------|----------|---------|--------"
for threads in 1 2 4 8 16 32; do
output=$({ time RAYON_NUM_THREADS=$threads cargo r --release > /dev/null; } 2>&1)
real=$(echo "$output" | grep "real" | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's/0m//;s/s//')
user=$(echo "$output" | grep "user" | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's/0m//;s/s//')
sys=$(echo "$output" | grep "sys" | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's/0m//;s/s//')
echo "$threads | $real | $user | $sys | ..."
done
EOF
chmod +x benchmark.sh
./benchmark.shUse proper benchmarking tools:|🔝|
# Install hyperfine (recommended)
cargo install hyperfine
# Compare different implementations
hyperfine \
'cargo r --release' \
'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=1 cargo r --release' \
'RAYON_NUM_THREADS=4 cargo r --release' \
--warmup 3Profile where time is spent:|🔝|
# Install flamegraph
cargo install flamegraph
# Generate flamegraph
cargo flamegraph --release --bin rust_multi_thread_1brc
# This creates flamegraph.svg showing exactly where CPU time goes📝 Summary Metrics|🔝|
| Metric | Value | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Total work | 48.60 ms | All CPU time needed |
| Parallel time | 32.39 ms | Wall-clock elapsed |
| Speedup | 1.50x | Due to threading |
| Efficiency | 1.50/20 = 7.5% | Low! (I/O bound) |
| Data processed | 44,693 records | Per run |
| Throughput | ~1,380 records/ms | ~1.4M records/sec |
🎯 Key Takeaways|🔝|
- Your timing is correct - The multi-threading is working (usr+sys > elapsed)
- But efficiency is low - Only 1.5x speedup on 20-core machine
- Bottleneck is I/O - File reading dominates, not computation
- For true 1BRC - Need streaming/chunked reading, not
.collect() - Your program is fast - 32ms is excellent for this demo dataset!
Would you like me to show you how to optimize for true billion-row performance, or analyze any specific aspect in more detail?
주요 시사점
①. 타이밍이 맞습니다 - 멀티스레딩이 작동 중입니다 (usr+sys > 경과)
②. 하지만 효율성은 낮습니다 - 20코어 머신에서 1.5배의 속도 향상에 불과합니다
③. 병목 현상은 I/O입니다 - 파일 읽기가 계산이 아닌 지배적입니다
④. 진정한 1BRC를 위해 - .collect()가 아닌 스트리밍/정크 읽기가 필요합니다
⑤. 당신의 프로그램은 빠릅니다 - 32ms는 이 데모 데이터셋에 매우 적합합니다!
진정한 10억 행 성능을 최적화하는 방법을 보여드릴까요, 아니면 특정 측면을 더 자세히 분석하는 방법을 알려드릴까요?
rust code(고칠게 많은 코드)|🔝|
use rayon::prelude::*;
use std::{
collections::HashMap,
fs::File,
io::{BufRead, BufReader},
path::PathBuf,
};
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
struct StationStats {
min_temp: f64,
max_temp: f64,
sum_temp: f64,
count: u64,
}
impl StationStats {
fn new(temperature: f64) -> Self {
StationStats {
min_temp: temperature,
max_temp: temperature,
sum_temp: temperature,
count: 1,
}
}
fn update(&mut self, temperature: f64) {
self.min_temp = self.min_temp.min(temperature);
self.max_temp = self.max_temp.max(temperature);
self.sum_temp += temperature;
self.count += 1;
}
fn mean(&self) -> f64 {
self.sum_temp / self.count as f64
}
// Merge two StationStats (for combining results from different threads)
fn merge(&mut self, other: &StationStats) {
self.min_temp = self.min_temp.min(other.min_temp);
self.max_temp = self.max_temp.max(other.max_temp);
self.sum_temp += other.sum_temp;
self.count += other.count;
}
}
fn parse_measurement_line(line: &str) -> Option<(&str, f64)> {
// Skip comment lines
if line.starts_with('#') || line.is_empty() {
return None;
}
// Parse 1BRC format: station_name;temperature
// Example: "Tokyo;35.6897" or "New York;-12.5"
let parts: Vec<&str> = line.split(';').collect();
if parts.len() == 2 {
let station_name = parts[0].trim();
let temp_str = parts[1].trim();
// Parse temperature, skip if invalid
if let Ok(temperature) = temp_str.parse::<f64>() {
return Some((station_name, temperature));
}
}
None
}
fn process_chunk(lines: Vec<String>) -> HashMap<String, StationStats> {
let mut stations: HashMap<String, StationStats> = HashMap::new();
for line in lines {
if let Some((station_name, temperature)) = parse_measurement_line(&line) {
stations
.entry(station_name.to_string())
.and_modify(|stats| stats.update(temperature))
.or_insert_with(|| StationStats::new(temperature));
}
}
stations
}
fn process_file_parallel(path: &PathBuf) -> HashMap<String, StationStats> {
let file = File::open(path).expect("Failed to open file");
let reader = BufReader::new(file);
// Read all lines into a vector (for large files, you'd use chunked reading)
let lines: Vec<String> = reader.lines().filter_map(|line| line.ok()).collect();
println!("Read {} lines from file", lines.len());
// Split into chunks for parallel processing
let num_threads = rayon::current_num_threads();
let chunk_size = (lines.len() + num_threads - 1) / num_threads;
let chunks: Vec<_> = lines
.chunks(chunk_size)
.map(|chunk| chunk.to_vec())
.collect();
println!(
"Processing {} chunks using {} threads",
chunks.len(),
num_threads
);
// Process chunks in parallel
let results: Vec<HashMap<String, StationStats>> =
chunks.into_par_iter().map(process_chunk).collect();
// Merge results from all threads
let mut merged_stations: HashMap<String, StationStats> = HashMap::new();
for thread_result in results {
for (station_name, stats) in thread_result {
merged_stations
.entry(station_name)
.and_modify(|existing| existing.merge(&stats))
.or_insert(stats);
}
}
merged_stations
}
fn print_results(stations: &HashMap<String, StationStats>) {
println!("Temperature Statistics by Weather Station:");
println!("{{");
let mut station_names: Vec<_> = stations.keys().collect();
station_names.sort();
for (i, name) in station_names.iter().enumerate() {
let stats = &stations[*name];
print!(
"{}={:.1}/{:.1}/{:.1}",
name,
stats.min_temp,
stats.mean(),
stats.max_temp
);
if i < station_names.len() - 1 {
print!(", ");
}
}
println!();
println!("}}");
}
fn main() {
let args: Vec<String> = std::env::args().collect();
let path = if args.len() > 1 {
PathBuf::from(&args[1])
} else {
println!("Usage: {} <path_to_weather_stations.txt>", args[0]);
println!("Reading from default path: assets/weather_stations.csv");
PathBuf::from("assets/weather_stations.csv")
};
println!("Processing file: {}", path.display());
// Use parallel processing for better performance
let stations = process_file_parallel(&path);
println!("Processed {} unique weather stations", stations.len());
print_results(&stations);
}cargo clippy로 최적화함.
clippy 수정 후
________________________________________________________
Executed in 44.90 millis fish external
usr time 48.08 millis 0.00 micros 48.08 millis
sys time 12.93 millis 670.00 micros 12.26 millistime분석|🔝|
- Looking at this timing output from your fish shell execution, here’s the analysis:
Time Breakdown
Wall-clock (real) time: 44.90 ms
- The actual elapsed time from start to finish
User CPU time: 48.08 ms
- Time spent in user-mode (non-kernel) execution
- Slightly MORE than wall-clock time
System CPU time: 12.93 ms
- Time spent in kernel-mode execution
- Total: 6070.00 microseconds shown in middle column
Key Observations
🔍 Multi-threading indicator: The fact that total CPU time (48.08 + 12.93 = 60.01 ms) exceeds wall-clock time (44.90 ms) strongly suggests this command used multiple threads. CPU time accumulates across all threads, so if you have 2+ cores working in parallel, total CPU time can exceed real time.
🔍 CPU efficiency:
- User: 48.08 ms / 44.90 ms = ~107% (suggests ~2 threads or modest parallelism)
- System: ~12.93 ms is about 21.5% of total CPU time (reasonable overhead)
🔍 Performance context: For a Rust program (given your project path), this is quite fast! Sub-50ms execution time is excellent for most command-line tools.
What This Tells Us
Your Rust multi-threaded optimization project appears to be working well - the timing profile shows effective parallel execution with minimal system overhead.
fix
- Perfect! Both Clippy warnings have been fixed. Here’s what I changed:
Line 89: Changed
filter_map(|line| line.ok())tomap_while(Result::ok)- This prevents potential infinite loops if the iterator repeatedly produces
Errvalues map_whilestops iteration on the firstErr, whilefilter_mapwould continue forever
- This prevents potential infinite loops if the iterator repeatedly produces
Line 95: Changed manual division ceiling calculation to use the built-in
div_ceil()method- Before:
(lines.len() + num_threads - 1) / num_threads - After:
lines.len().div_ceil(num_threads) - More idiomatic and clearer intent
- Before:
The code now passes Clippy checks with no warnings!
고친 코드|🔝|
use std::{
collections::HashMap,
fs::File,
io::{BufRead, BufReader},
path::PathBuf,
};
use rayon::iter::{IntoParallelIterator, ParallelIterator};
#[derive(Debug, Clone)]
struct StationStats {
min_temp: f64,
max_temp: f64,
sum_temp: f64,
count: u64,
}
impl StationStats {
fn new(temperature: f64) -> Self {
StationStats {
min_temp: temperature,
max_temp: temperature,
sum_temp: temperature,
count: 1,
}
}
fn update(&mut self, temperature: f64) {
self.min_temp = self.min_temp.min(temperature);
self.max_temp = self.max_temp.max(temperature);
self.sum_temp += temperature;
self.count += 1;
}
fn mean(&self) -> f64 {
self.sum_temp / self.count as f64
}
// Merge two StationStats (for combining results from different threads)
fn merge(&mut self, other: &StationStats) {
self.min_temp = self.min_temp.min(other.min_temp);
self.max_temp = self.max_temp.max(other.max_temp);
self.sum_temp += other.sum_temp;
self.count += other.count;
}
}
fn parse_measurement_line(line: &str) -> Option<(&str, f64)> {
// Skip comment lines
if line.starts_with('#') || line.is_empty() {
return None;
}
// Parse 1BRC format: station_name;temperature
// Example: "Tokyo;35.6897" or "New York;-12.5"
let parts: Vec<&str> = line.split(';').collect();
if parts.len() == 2 {
let station_name = parts[0].trim();
let temp_str = parts[1].trim();
// Parse temperature, skip if invalid
if let Ok(temperature) = temp_str.parse::<f64>() {
return Some((station_name, temperature));
}
}
None
}
fn process_chunk(lines: Vec<String>) -> HashMap<String, StationStats> {
let mut stations: HashMap<String, StationStats> = HashMap::new();
for line in lines {
if let Some((station_name, temperature)) = parse_measurement_line(&line) {
stations
.entry(station_name.to_string())
.and_modify(|stats| stats.update(temperature))
.or_insert_with(|| StationStats::new(temperature));
}
}
stations
}
fn process_file_parallel(path: &PathBuf) -> HashMap<String, StationStats> {
let file = File::open(path).expect("Failed to open file");
let reader = BufReader::new(file);
// Read all lines into a vector (for large files, you'd use chunked reading)
let lines: Vec<String> = reader.lines().map_while(Result::ok).collect();
println!("Read {} lines from file", lines.len());
// Split into chunks for parallel processing
let num_threads = rayon::current_num_threads();
let chunk_size = lines.len().div_ceil(num_threads);
let chunks: Vec<_> = lines
.chunks(chunk_size)
.map(|chunk| chunk.to_vec())
.collect();
println!(
"Processing {} chunks using {} threads",
chunks.len(),
num_threads
);
// Process chunks in parallel
let results: Vec<HashMap<String, StationStats>> =
chunks.into_par_iter().map(process_chunk).collect();
// Merge results from all threads
let mut merged_stations: HashMap<String, StationStats> = HashMap::new();
for thread_result in results {
for (station_name, stats) in thread_result {
merged_stations
.entry(station_name)
.and_modify(|existing| existing.merge(&stats))
.or_insert(stats);
}
}
merged_stations
}
fn print_results(stations: &HashMap<String, StationStats>) {
println!("Temperature Statistics by Weather Station:");
println!("{{");
let mut station_names: Vec<_> = stations.keys().collect();
station_names.sort();
for (i, name) in station_names.iter().enumerate() {
let stats = &stations[*name];
print!(
"{}={:.1}/{:.1}/{:.1}",
name,
stats.min_temp,
stats.mean(),
stats.max_temp
);
if i < station_names.len() - 1 {
print!(", ");
}
}
println!();
println!("}}");
}
fn main() {
let args: Vec<String> = std::env::args().collect();
let path = if args.len() > 1 {
PathBuf::from(&args[1])
} else {
println!("Usage: {} <path_to_weather_stations.txt>", args[0]);
println!("Reading from default path: assets/weather_stations.csv");
PathBuf::from("assets/weather_stations.csv")
};
println!("Processing file: {}", path.display());
// Use parallel processing for better performance
let stations = process_file_parallel(&path);
println!("Processed {} unique weather stations", stations.len());
print_results(&stations);
}